Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Dearey
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
![]() | This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2010 February 23. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
]Mark Dearey
- Mark Dearey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
non notable local politician Oo7565 (talk) 03:51, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the talk) 12:34, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the talk) 12:35, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:POLITICIAN and nothing in the article suggests anything that would qualify him. Valenciano (talk) 12:56, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I can see why it was suggested for deletion, but on second glance MD can apparently multi-task and is cited for other things.Red Hurley (talk) 17:55, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non notable local politican with poorly sourced article.Cathar11 (talk) 21:02, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Fails talk) 21:05, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete without prejudice. Now he fails for lack of biography of a living person. I could find merely one News Ghit. Bearian (talk) 01:21, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.