Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Llewellyn-Slade (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 07:56, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Llewellyn-Slade

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of this article does not pass GNG. Perhaps his business is notable, but that would require a different page and focus. The sources of this article do not focus on Llewellyn-Slade, but on a business he founded. Kbabej (talk) 02:22, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Kbabej (talk) 02:25, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Kbabej (talk) 02:27, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 03:31, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:26, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non notable, PR --Devokewater (talk) 16:37, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The sources show GNG for his business but not for him. Perhaps there should be a page on the company, writeen by someone without a COI.GDX420 (talk) 15:17, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.