Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Halstead (second nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -

Martin Halstead

Martin Halstead was nominated for deletion on 2005-12-20. The result of the discussion was "speedy keep because nomination withdrawn". For the prior discussion, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Halstead.

• Delete- I would like to ask, why are we making this page about this wannabe
  Nobel prize, even if user 213.40.67.66 is actually you, well check the variations of this page by this user, another one is that, he done most of these vanity edits himself, and appears to not be able to take any criticisms by deleting the discussion bit. BTW, IN CASE YOU DO ANYMORE, I AM WATCHING YOU, MR MARTIN HALSTEAD. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joey Gaybot (talk • contribs
  ) 2006-10-18 16:03:37

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 09:50, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Not sure that I understand the ranting above - sounds personal - but in any case this article is about someone, much over-hyped, who failed to start an airline. The article about the airline was, I believe, deleted. If his failed business plan is not in Wiki, why is he? Emeraude 14:22, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete This guy is an 18-year-old who got some press about "starting up his own airline". He has a website [1] and was interviewed by the BBC [2] but if you look at the website the airline doesn't seem to be actually operating. All subsidiary pages on the website are 404s. He's now a DJ in Oxford. I see nothing notable in this. Had he actually started up the airline, he might be notable due to his age. --Charlene.fic 16:02, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Judging by Joey Gaybot's previous edits to the article [3], and by the infantile tantrum above, this appears to be a bad faith nomination. Wavy G 17:15, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete nothing worth keeping. Arbusto 21:37, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.