Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marx Reloaded

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 18:38, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Marx Reloaded

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This film does not appear to be particularly notable. WCityMike 18:18, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:32, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Since it has not yet been released in the US, English-language reviews are not readily available. However, as it appears to have been the recipient of critical commentary in German-language sources independent of the subject, I would have to assess that notable in Germany, is notable enough for en.Wikipedia. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 02:34, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I find it quite bizarre that it's even nominated. I shall now add further evidence of its notability in terms which suit the specific requirements of English wikipedia. But, once again, bizarre. And a waste of everyone's time. Rachel0898 (talk) 14:03, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I note that for what has been flagged as a non-notable film the Marx Reloaded page has generated 5890 views [1] in the last 30 days. Arguably a high number given I can find no additional information about an English-language release date. Further, although it's hardly comparing like with like - especially since the following film is over ten years old - Spider (film), a UK English-language feature film with a notable, even cult director attached, and which was released in cinemas worldwide, generated 8912 hits in the last 30 days. Rachel0898 (talk) 21:27, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:49, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Per
WP:N. Monterey Bay (talk) 02:55, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep. Notability has been established by the sources. Orange Suede Sofa (talk) 17:09, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
KEEP: crazy that this has been considered for deletion: an entry for an actually-existing documentary film that has already been broadcast in france and germany, which takes a serious look at the 'global financial crisis' we all purport to be be so interested in, which presents the view of a raft of well known theorists about this crisis, which drags marx, trotsky and lenin into the modern 'matrix' and which has already generated a substantial amount of english-language discussion online ahead of a release in the UK; all in all pretty relevant for a free encyclopedia. Muzzafrabad 11 June 2011 --Muzzafrabad (talk) 20:27, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
KEEP - a well written and resourced entry on a serious topic - a genuine keeper. Mark^Dask 23:31, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.