Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary Althaus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete Mandsford 22:22, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mary Althaus

Mary Althaus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to find any reliable sources independent of the subject to

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 21:35, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 21:35, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 21:35, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Article lacks
  WP:GNG. Happy Editing! — 71.166.157.40 (talk · contribs) _{02:40, 10 October 2010 (UTC)}[reply
  ]
• Delete I can find no
  independent sources which would indicate that she meets the criteria for inclusion -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 12:30, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete. I think nom pegs it correctly. Even if a source were found to confirm some of the basics, the main claim of notability seems to rest on being the host of a tele-course – this is a country mile short of notability. Respectfully, Agricola44 (talk) 16:53, 11 October 2010 (UTC).[reply]
• Speedy Delete. Not even close to being notable. 68.45.109.14 (talk) 16:53, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Fails
  WP:V --> doesn't belong here. Alzarian16 (talk) 09:26, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete There look to be a few relevant hits on google scholar, but none are remotely well-cited. Otherwise, not finding anything at all. Sailsbystars (talk) 16:10, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.