Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary Kay Sigaty

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:02, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mary Kay Sigaty

Mary Kay Sigaty (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails Notability - WP:Politician Subject has never held Statewide Office, as well as WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV, press coverage is all local and trivial. WP:PROD removed without explanation. MilaPedia (talk) 07:53, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: To call the references "local and trivial" is being generous. Most of them cover the elections or her opponents/successors, and only mention her in passing. I thought the first reference (to an actual book) might make a difference, but this is the extent of her coverage in it.
    Mysterious Whisper 12:11, 14 August 2013 (UTC) (Full disclosure: Previous discussion)[reply
    ]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:39, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:40, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Nine articles regarding Howard County Executives/Commissioners/Councilmen have been recommended for deletion based on not meeting only one of the three polices in
    WP:Politician
    by User:MilaPedia with an account created 9 August 2013.

A banner was posted using the “proposed deletion/dated format, with concern = Article fails Notability -

WP:Politician
Subject has never held Statewide Office”

WP:Politition states- 1. Politicians and judges who have held international, national or sub-national (statewide/provincewide) office, and members or former members of a national, state or provincial legislature. This also applies to those who have been elected to such offices but have not yet been sworn in. 2. Major local political figures who have received significant press coverage. 3. Just being an elected local official, or an unelected candidate for political office, does not guarantee notability, although such people can still be notable if they meet the primary notability criterion of "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject of the article". In the case of candidates for political office who do not meet this guideline, the general rule is to redirect to an appropriate page covering the election or political office sought in lieu of deletion. Relevant material from the biographical article can be merged into the election or political office page if appropriate.

The banner stated - If you can address this concern by improving, copyediting, sourcing, renaming or merging the page, please edit this page and do so. You may remove this message if you improve the article or otherwise object to deletion for any reason. Although not required, you are encouraged to explain why you object to the deletion, either in your edit summary or on the talk page. If this template is removed, do not replace it

Following the specific instructions, the concern was met by meeting section 3 of WP:POLITICIAN by additionally citing each article from a book, in addition to existing citations. The notation was marked in the summary, and the AFS tag removed as instructed. The following entry was posted on MilaPedia’s talk - Thank you MilaPedia for your efforts to make sure all new articles related specifically to Howard County Elected Officials are to be deleted. The articles are works in progress, however each has been significantly cited from a variety of sources which meet criteria #3 of WP Politician (listed below). Some of the articles recommended for deletion are politicians that have also sought higher office and are also notable for their influence in their respective fields. In addition, the guidance clearly states alternatives to AFD "deletion" as a first step. I hope you will direct your future efforts toward expanding and improving these articles with accurate information and relevant citations.

Recommendations were given in Lieu of deletion. Six of the same articles were recommended for deletion again August 14, 2013 with the following notation – "Article fails Notability - WP:Politician Subject has never held Statewide Office, as well as WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV - Press coverage is all local and trivial. WP:PROD removed without explanation." Each article is in progress, and has been well-cited by a variety of sources, and extra care has been taken to exclude the extensive amount of voting history and procedure that may be considered trivial or not independent of the subject. Although notability is subjective, each is relevant in the history of a rural county that became one of the 10 wealthiest counties in America during their terms and provides supporting information to historical articles. Notification was provided to the user, and noted in summaries. The AFD’s recommended are very specific with similar articles in the same categories not facing the same scrutiny, such as

Calvin Ball, III. FlugKerl (talk) 15:32, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

* In this particular (stub) article, no obituary was used for a source, just 6 newpspaper articles, one book, and two official websites. Mary Kay Sigaty is alive as of July 2013.[1] FlugKerl (talk) 18:00, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Mysterious Whisper 12:54, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply
]
  • Delete - Google search turned up nothing but trivial hits. Only hits concerned subject being office holder, or running for office. No notability was found otherwise. Caffeyw (talk) 09:21, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • Multiple voting in numerous AfDs is really not OK here. Guy1890 (talk) 22:22, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
      • It's not a multiple vote. You complained about the fact the vote was copy/pasted and thus shouldn't be used. It was suggested to reply to each showing the issues and to overcome the concern on copy/paste. I've done so. Notably nothing is being said to keep, it's just a complaint about copy/pasting. I also note that the concern seems to only be about mine, despite the post before mine being a massive copy/paste. Caffeyw (talk) 04:02, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
        • "It's not a multiple vote." Yes, it clearly is. "It was suggested to reply to each showing the issues and to overcome the concern on copy/paste." I have not seen any such suggestion given to you at all. The issue with your edits here "Caffeyw" is really not whether or not this (or any other Wikipedia article) should be deleted, it's that you apparently have little idea what you are supposed to be doing in these AfD discussions in the first place. Guy1890 (talk) 04:24, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
  1. ^ Amanda Yeager (18 July 2013). "Howard council members look for balance". The Baltimore Sun.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mary_Kay_Sigaty&oldid=1194627404"