Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maths A

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete all articles.

]

Maths A

Unnecessary subject description supposedly part of the Australian secondary mathematics curriculum. The external link (praising Jacaranda Online for their "award-winning textbooks") makes me suspect this is

. Also doubt some of its veracity: curricula can change quickly, and I'm pretty sure this is only used in Queensland.

I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reasons:

• Maths B
• Maths C

--Canley 03:27, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Canley 03:30, 18 July 2006 (UTC)</small[reply]
• Strong delete - the article is written in a way as to refer to the textbook, not the HSC or VCE subject, which vary from state to state. It is an ad, not a curricula listing.Blnguyen | rant-line 03:38, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. JPD (talk) 09:41, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I recognise the subject names from the Queensland senior secondary schools curriculum, however, the articles do not seem to be Wikipedia material. An article on the curriculum issues with Australian secondary education would be interesting, however, it would hold none of this material, therefore, they should be removed as rightfully linkspam. Ansell 10:33, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - per nom KarenAnn 10:54, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 12:15, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• See also
  Math A/B, and Math B, the articles on the New York mathematics curriculum; Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Algebra 2; and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Algebra II. Uncle G 13:14, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 15:18, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. No
  WP:RS
  that it's actually in the curriculum; even if on the publisher's site (which has Javascript errors for me), it might only mean that they were proposed standards.
• Delete. Hardee67 04:27, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Keep - these are real subjects in Queensland at least. Lankiveil 06:17, 19 July 2006 (UTC).[reply]
• Delete existing doesn't make somthing encyclopedic.--
  Peta 12:56, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete Not useful. I'm sure there are many units named Maths A, Maths B or Maths C. Cedars 05:17, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per Blnguyen.
  Talk) 11:46, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Weak Delete per Blnguyen. An article on the standard (as in the NY article Math A would be acceptable. Septentrionalis 13:56, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge into one article on
  Australian Mathematics curriculum (or similar name). --Tango 15:45, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete per nom. Massmato 16:34, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.