Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Riviera (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. BigDom (talk) 10:46, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Matt Riviera

Matt Riviera (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. —Nikki♥311 19:07, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:18, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:19, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• This article was deleted back in 2009 for being non-notable and after having a quick look for sources I would say that is still the case. Does not meet the
  general notability guideline. Delete. Jenks24 (talk) 16:08, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete doesn't meet notability guidelines; that is, unless your name is Jethro Bodine and you hail from Bugtussle--Hokeman (talk) 00:34, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Acather96 (talk) 06:58, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Regards, MacMed^talk_stalk 22:11, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

• Keep Passes WP:ENTERTAINER per professional wrestler, actor... He survives the notability requirements.--BabbaQ (talk) 14:43, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

this article needs a re-write not deletion.--BabbaQ (talk) 14:44, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete What this article needs are
  WP:ENTERTAINER or any other notability criteria. ttonyb (talk) 00:52, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep Two full pages of Google News hits give some evidence of notability. While the source quality is not exactly Washington Post or New York Times, there are 21 hits. One source I looked at was just a passing mention, but the second and third I picked at random: Hot Indie News and News Blaze, are indepth. Anarchangel (talk) 11:25, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment – the quality of the sources is not the highest and most are just passing mentions or press releases. Of two you specifically mentioned, one is a PR generated by ECLECTIC MEDIA PRODUCTIONS and even mentions the media company in the release. The other sure is written as a PR, not a news article. ttonyb (talk) 14:44, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - looks like he lacks the necessary significant coverage in reliable and independent sources to prove notability. Yaksar (let's chat) 06:20, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per the above - lack of notability, sourcing, etc. The
  Usual Caveats apply, however - the subject could easily become notable at some point. I would recommend that this go to DRV before recreating (again). UltraExactZZ ^Said ~ Did 14:26, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Weak keep. The 2 sources mentioned by Anarchangel appear to be
  supersources. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:35, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The second source you cite, from newsblaze.com, appears to be a verbatim copy of a press release, including the advert for the PR company at the end. Not sure about the other one, though. UltraExactZZ ^Said ~ Did 01:41, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete It seems painfully clear to me that the two "sources" identified are press releases, they use the standard press release format, e.g. the closing paragraphs. Not a single reliable source providing in-depth coverage has been presented, nor have I found any in my own searches, GNG is not met. --joe decker^{talk to me} 05:03, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per the lack of third-party
  reliable sources. http://www.hotindienews.com/2009/07/14/105107 reads like a press release. A sample:

  For a sneak preview at the show: http://www.vh1.com/video/play.jhtml?id=1613969&vid=405979

  For more information about “Megan Wants a Millionaire,” you can visit the show’s official website.

  http://www.vh1.com/shows/megan_wants_a_millionaire/series.jhtml

  http://www.hotindienews.com/contact states:

  We always accept electronic press releases and physical submissions to help indies increase their world-wide exposure. So, please feel free to send your CDs, DVDs, and Press Kits to the address listed below for consideration on our site.

  The second source mentioned by Anarchangel (talk · contribs), http://newsblaze.com/story/20100227105953zzzz.nb/topstory.html, is also a press release. The article is published by Eclectic Media, which the article touts as the "24/7 full service PR Company that is effective".

  This article should be deleted for failing Wikipedia:Notability and Wikipedia:Notability (people). Cunard (talk) 07:47, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply

  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.