Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maulana Tariq Jamil Foundation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 10:22, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Maulana Tariq Jamil Foundation

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

WP:SIGCOV. Found one independent source (apart from the one cited) mentioning the creation of an ambulance service, based on an Instagram post by the organisation. draft exists (by the same author), but was declined. Article was redirected to Tariq Jamil#Maulana Tariq Jamil Foundation but this was reverted by the author. Kleuske (talk) 09:16, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Kleuske (talk) 09:16, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Kleuske (talk) 09:16, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, author is
WP:GAMING the system by creating a mainspace article when their draft has been declined. MrsSnoozyTurtle 09:28, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Redirect to
WP:ORGDEPTH Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:35, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete No significant coverage. No objection to a redirect either. FDW777 (talk) 09:58, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – bad practice of
talk) 12:47, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Speedy-delete Makes
no claim of notability for this org, and not for lack of looking for one to make, per others here and reviewers at Draft:Maulana Tariq Jamil Foundation. Creator of this (I agree trying to game around their declined draft) is at AE for various abuses. DMacks (talk) 16:56, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.