Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/McKenzie Lee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 10:49, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

McKenzie Lee

McKenzie Lee (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Best new starlet isn't enough if the subject clearly fails GNG

• Comment Yes it does. You need to familiarise yourself with
  36th AVN Awards), which helpfully list out the "major awards" for you - one of which is "Best new starlet". Britishfinance (talk) 19:54, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Note: This discussion has been included in the

talk) 18:49, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the

talk) 18:49, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the

talk) 18:49, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

• Delete does not pass the notability guidelines for pornographic performers.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:26, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Not GNG Rscottjensen (talk) 03:47, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:41, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:41, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Solid Keep. She meets
  Spartaz: You need to familiarise yourself with WP:PORNBIO before making further nominations. You have nominated a whole series of actors with AVN Awards who are all automatic Keeps. These people do not often screen well on quality RS for GNG for obvious reasons, hence WP:PORNBIO. Britishfinance (talk) 02:16, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Coment - Best New Starlet meets PORNBIO?Guilherme Burn (talk) 19:44, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. You can find the list of "major" AVN awards in WP here (
  36th AVN Awards), and it lists Best New Starlet as a "major award". We need to stick to WP:PAG and WP:PORNBIO here, and somebody's personal view on these actresses (which I know are contraversial), "contrived" outside of these PAGs. Britishfinance (talk) 19:50, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Delete if you have to rely on PORNBIO because good sourcing is not available then the point is missed. Needs to meet GNG and
  WP:ENT which this person does not. Legacypac (talk) 18:17, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete: a BLP that lacks sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail. Fails
  WP:BASIC. Best New Starlet does not even meet the (more or less discredited) PORNBIO, as the article on it has been deleted for lack of notability. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:41, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete No reliable sources. AVN interviews are practically primary sources. Trillfendi (talk) 20:33, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as no evidence of any notability, Fails PORNBIO & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 22:49, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails both PORNBIO and GNG. Cindlevet (talk) 19:46, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.