Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Media Packs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 23:43, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Media Packs

Does not appear to be notable. A Google search for "media packs co ltd" turns up 63 hits (22 unique; as of 03:57, 17 April 2009 (UTC)), all of which are either company-controlled or press release republishers. I was unable to find a citation for the notability claim in the article that the company is a "major brand" with 70% Chinese market share and 30% world-wide market share. Without that it doesn't satisfy notability guidelines. — Saxifrage ✎ 03:57, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I should note that I edited the article heavily to get it into a reasonable shape before I tried to establish notability. This version is what I started with, just in case I removed something relevant to discussion. — Saxifrage ✎ 04:34, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:09, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, a
non-consumer business whose activity is mostly invisible to the general public, referenced only to what appears to be a press release. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:17, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.