Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mediaplanet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted per CSD:G11, company marketing director Ollpsson blocked as advertising-only account. – Athaenara ✉ 23:41, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mediaplanet

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per

WP:NCORP. The parent company, and awards the company has claimed to have won do not have existing pages on WP. Outside of those claims of significance, the article reads as a resume without any additional explanation as to why this company is notable. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 18:53, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:01, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think I made edits so the article is unbiased and have relevant references to be able to be kept in Wikipedia. Since it is a group with annual turnover of 55 million dollar, I really think it makes sense to have an article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ollepsson (talk • contribs) 14:40, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:04, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:27, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- corporate spam, replete with an office directory. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:38, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.