Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melody Jordan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Has been userfied by creator. Speedy G7 Ged UK 14:05, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Melody Jordan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails even the lax standards of WP:PORNBIO, only one non-scene nomination. Fails the GNG, no GNews hits, all GBooks hits are spurious. Just another porn performer BLP without a shred of reliably sourced biographical content. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 15:48, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Even though all the sources are blocked on my network it is clear that the subject matter has no reason to be on wikipedia.--Jeffrd10 (talk) 16:46, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 18:32, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 18:32, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 18:32, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Actually, there are two non-scene-related nominations: Best New Starlet and Best Tease Performance (some users have tried to suggest that Best Tease Performance is a scene-related award but there has been no consensus for that). Erpert ^{WHAT DO YOU WANT???} 20:55, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
delete PORNBIO is disputed and over arching this is a clear community expectation that BLPs must be properly sourced. Indeed, wikipedia has no place for BLPs without impeccable sourcing.
Spartaz ^Humbug! 23:09, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete - Fails PORNBIO. That tease performance nomination is scene-related. The tease is only part of a scene and in many ways such a nomination can be considered even lesser than much of the scene nominations. Morbidthoughts (talk) 00:58, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Where was that actually decided though? If you show me, I'll concede to a delete. Erpert ^{WHAT DO YOU WANT???} 05:46, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.