Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melting Pot (film)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn with no remaining deletion proposals. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 (talk) 05:04, 9 December 2021 (UTC)]
Melting Pot (film)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Melting Pot (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails
WP:BEFORE search. It needs more coverage in order to be eligible. The Film Creator (talk) 16:45, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:20, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
Delete, a search under both titles found only the Variety review and no other sources. Devonian Wombat (talk) 03:01, 5 December 2021 (UTC)Changing my vote to Keep per the sources found by Geschichte. Devonian Wombat (talk) 03:55, 9 December 2021 (UTC)- Keep per Variety review, Chicago Tribune review and Los Angeles Times review (newsp.com version) There is also a review here which I don't know if is RS, maybe not. Geschichte (talk) 09:32, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
- I withdraw this nomination per WP:NEXIST since there are reviews from Variety, the Chicago Tribune and the LA Times. The Film Creator (talk) 14:07, 5 December 2021 (UTC)]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.