Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miami Golf Magazine
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:37, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Miami Golf Magazine
- Miami Golf Magazine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Speedied once, prod challenged. No third-party evidence of notability. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:04, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Contested prod, a small magazine that does not establish notability. The article is also unsourced. Thunder 23:16, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Golf-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:33, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:33, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I can't find anything on it at all other than some book reviews it has been quoted for. Hobit (talk) 23:57, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Notability is not established. Any article can get hits on google but the quality of the hits are key (ie. Oxford, Cambridge, Dallas Morning News, Washington post, etc). There's nothing here. Artene50 (talk) 09:16, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and salt, pure spam. Article was posted by the publisher. Not notable, either. He even removed the AfD notice. I think that User:Thomasaniello's days are numbered at Wikipedia. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 02:34, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete, about to block creator for username/spam violation. Daniel Case (talk) 02:51, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- And the original author has been indef-blocked. The number of days was quite small. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 01:31, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.