Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Micah Parsons

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.

]

Micah Parsons

Micah Parsons (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet the notability criteria described in WP:NCOLLATH I'm bringing this here because I'm no expert on American football and it's possible I'm mistaken. Deb (talk) 08:43, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 13:23, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 13:23, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Parsons is the No. 7 overall prospect in the Class of 2018 according to ESPN.com and has committed to Penn State with plans to enroll early in January. He is the rare high school athlete who can satisfy
    WP:NHSPHSATH. The recruitment has been extensive and plagued by controversy and satisfies NHSPHSATH's requirement of "substantial and prolonged coverage" that "clearly" goes beyond WP:ROUTINE. Coverage at ESPN.com (the gold standard for significant national sports coverage) includes this, this, and this. Also this from Sports Illustrated, [1] from ABC News, and this from CBS Sports. Cbl62 (talk) 14:16, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Okay, thanks, that's useful. I'm sure the article can be improved with addition of appropriate references. Deb (talk) 10:40, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:00, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.