Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael G. Manning
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 12:36, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Michael G. Manning (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested prod. Self-published author of questionable notability. No indications of notability for the person or the books. Google news search on "Michael G. Manning" Mageborn shows zero results. Standard search shows a lot of sales links and social media pages by the author, but no significant coverage from reliable sources. MikeWazowski (talk) 17:40, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:29, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relistedto generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:55, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Does not approach notability. One blog review. That's it. Tigerboy1966 (talk) 22:22, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.