Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michele Northup

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 22:50, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Michele Northup

Michele Northup (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability per

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster _talk 19:04, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster _talk 19:04, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster _talk 19:04, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete per nom.

• Delete. This is a spam page for the sauce company; no claim to notability here at all. Very minor coverage not amounting to notability:

  1 N local flavour coverage citing a couple X of the Y awards, not significant

  2 N county blog, not journalistic coverage and not significant

  3 N local coverage; article is primarily a recipe

  4 N not a source at all

  5 N alumni coverage and so not independent; coverage is of the business and not her

  6 N local coverage; not significant, but actually about her. However, independence is questionable - the photo in the article is sourced to the subject, and the article promotes one of her businesses at the bottom.

  If anything, the sources better support an article about the sauce company than about her, though I think it would be tough to defend that article too. Does not meet

  WP:GNG. FalconK (talk) 00:43, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply

  ]

*Delete As per nom. Pilean (talk) 13:47, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Lacking required depth-of-coverage for
  WP:BIO. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:23, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete -
  paid-for spam, see [1]. MER-C 15:55, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete undisclosed paid for spam with no evidence of notability. GSS ^💬 17:18, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.