Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michelle McMullen
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. LFaraone 00:38, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Michelle McMullen
- Michelle McMullen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I just declined a PROD for this article. she has some limited notability, but not so little as to be a clear deletion w/o some discussion. article of course is poorly written, not a criteria for deletion. the argument for keep may be around the uniqueness of the story. I am really not sure, but suspect she isnt notable enough. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 01:45, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the ]
- Note: This debate has been included in the ]
- Delete - Not sure if there is such a thing as WP:BLP1E. Or call it "not an encyclopedia-worthy topic." Carrite (talk) 18:38, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment If she is not convicted yet, she doesnt even qualify as a noted criminal, and being a suspect in a crime is not reason enough for an article, unless their status as a suspect is so overwhelmingly notable, like Richard Jewell.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 19:32, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails ]
- Delete per WP:CRIME - A person who is known only in connection with a criminal event or trial should not normally be the subject of a separate Wikipedia article - →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 22:36, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete; the subject of this AfD has received in-depth coverage I can understand recreation of this article.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 22:22, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.