Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michelle Tidball

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

Michelle Tidball (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 10:40, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 10:40, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 10:40, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete non notable --Devokewater 11:24, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Not remotely notable. Lacking significant coverage in independent sources. Not aversed to restoring the redirect. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:11, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect and SALT, Her only basis for notability is her connection to Kanye West’s campaign, and therefore, she is likely to be searched for the meantime.—Molandfreak (talk, contribs, email) 19:23, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to
  Kanye West 2020 presidential campaign. Her only claim to notability is being West's running mate. LefcentrerightDiscuss 20:02, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Redirect to
  Kanye West 2020 presidential campaign. If she receives greater attention (unlikely) then the page can be restored. Pennsylvania2 (talk) 03:36, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Redirect to
  99​thx Email! 08:45, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:43, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to
  Kanye West 2020 presidential campaign and SALT per nomination. This is a second of an above suggestion.--Mpen320 (talk) 15:43, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Redirect to
  Kanye West 2020 presidential campaign and SALT per nomination. She is not notable as preacher largely outside of the public eye. Running for VP on the Birthday Party ticket does not make her notable either.--Darryl Kerrigan (talk) 18:46, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete and Redirect to
  Kanye West 2020 presidential campaign, not a notable individual. SecretName101 (talk) 20:04, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Redirect to
  Kanye West 2020 presidential campaign. Not independently notable, per nomination. A. Randomdude0000 (talk) 21:52, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Redirect to
  SALT it is one or the other, we can redirect and protect but again I think that's premature. Glen 09:48, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply
  ]

My rationale for protection is that Tidball is likely to be searched for, but remain a minor profile, in the coming months because of her connection to the election. I doubt the user who created the redirect's intention was for this to become a standalone article, and the user who removed the redirect and created the standalone article has fewer than 50 edits.--Molandfreak (talk, contribs, email) 16:48, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SALT typically means protect a deleted page from recreation. In this case we'd be protecting a redirect which whilst nuanced is slightly different. But yes get your point and ultimately I think if (likely when) West's presidential run implodes this will probably be the final outcome. Glen 19:13, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

• Redirect per nom to
  talk 10:41, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep people are wanting to search for this. User: Rushtheeditor 12:21, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

^^^^

💬💬) 21:06, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Yes, and they are likely to find mention of her in the

Third-party and independent candidates for the 2020 United States presidential election sub-page. The fact that people will be googling her does not mean she needs a separate article.--Darryl Kerrigan (talk) 21:15, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

• Delete and ?maybe? Redirect: I say maybe because subject has not even acknowledged nomination.--Thespasticone

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.