Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Microshaft Winblows 98
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. withdrawn by nominator (
]Microshaft Winblows 98
- Microshaft Winblows 98 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find video game sources: "Microshaft Winblows 98" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk)
Doesn't pass
]Withdrawn by nominator. Print sources exist (for someone who can get past the paywall) and there is no opposition. Speedy keep #1. ]
- Note: This debate has been included in the ]
- Keep. GNews and HighBeam searches show coverage of this product in multiple independent sources. Many are behind paywalls but I added a few that were not. Appears to have been a notable Microsoft parody and passes GNG. --Arxiloxos (talk) 05:26, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Wasn't able to replicate on GNews. And since the added refs only mention the game in a cursory fashion, I think we'd have trouble (1) passing the "significant coverage" ]
- You have to look at GNews Archives.[1] Theoretically this should be reachable in one click from the "news" link in the AfD header, above, but there's something wrong with the link. --Arxiloxos (talk) 14:22, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks—I put a note on the template's page. Some of those refs look like they could be useful, but I can't see the character of their discussion from outside the paywall or proof of the parody's ]
- You have to look at GNews Archives.[1] Theoretically this should be reachable in one click from the "news" link in the AfD header, above, but there's something wrong with the link. --Arxiloxos (talk) 14:22, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Wasn't able to replicate on GNews. And since the added refs only mention the game in a cursory fashion, I think we'd have trouble (1) passing the "significant coverage" ]
- Keep - While the current sourcing is borderline, with only the PC Gamer review being substantive, there is other significant RS coverage out there. A Google Books search turned up articles in Computer Gaming World, Time, and Business Week. —Torchiest talkedits 13:08, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.