Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Microsoft Cortana Easter Eggs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Trevj (talk · contribs) 19:24, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Microsoft Cortana Easter Eggs

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. 11:49, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. 11:49, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. 11:49, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. 11:49, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

The subject of this article is not

huge list of trivia

and an instance of copyright violation of one source.

Wikiquote might accept this article, however. (Although copyright violation might still be a problem.) Codename Lisa (talk) 11:41, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Perhaps including one or two of those predetermined answers as a note within the
Microsoft Cortana article would be just fine, but such a list just isn't good enough for having a separate article. — Dsimic (talk | contribs) 03:25, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete: But, consider making it a section on the
Microsoft Cortana article. 70.97.195.217 (talk) 20:01, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar

♔ 02:32, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Merge: This information would be great on the main Cortana article. EndlessCoffee54 (talk) 03:49, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Copyright violations, no information could be merged apart from the first sentence and a few of the answers.
talk) 15:24, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.