Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miguel Mendonca
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. The Bushranger One ping only 00:50, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Miguel Mendonca
- Miguel Mendonca (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Thinly sourced--at best -- biography of a minor--at best--environmental writer. No real claims of importance, impact, or notoriety can be found, other that he's been published by a trade/specialist press. CalendarWatcher (talk) 11:12, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. — — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 14:39, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. — — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 14:39, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Multiple serious/scholarly books from reputable publishers. Worldcat search shows extensive library holdings of his books, particularly in academic libraries. GNews search shows a lot of apparently substantive coverage, almost exclusively in Spanish-language media. GScholar turns up more than enough hits to convince me that he should be presumed notable absent a convincing case otherwise. "Minor" doesn't translate to "not notable," even assuming that characterization is accurate. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 16:28, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per HW -- notable author with extensive coverage. Johnfos (talk) 00:38, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.