Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miho Tanaka (model)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Unsourced

BLP. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:50, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Miho Tanaka (model)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Philafrenzy (talk) 17:00, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:13, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:13, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Miss Tanaka has an extensive portfolio, of nearly 100 print and television appearences. The article is however, a stub, and cites Japanese language sources. Nevertheless, citations given on her agency website (in Japanese) are mainstream media sources and are both notable and verifiable. Citation must be improved. Personal disclosure: even though I lived in Japan as a child, I am hardly fluent in Japanese.Flyingtent (talk) 07:21, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:07, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The article itself doesn't exactly make the strongest argument for her notability, it seems to me, and it links only to her official site. No refs. Gnews turns up nothing. Flyingtent's link does list what might be notable TV appearances, but it's all just a list of credits with no media coverage to be seen. Mbinebri ^{talk ←} 23:37, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:53, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.