Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mikel San José
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. When he plays a pro game, gimme a call & I'll restore the page. — Scientizzle 00:42, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Mikel San José
- Mikel San José (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Not notable under
WP:FOOTY/Notability. He has not played a professional game. John Hayestalk 01:24, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply
]
- Delete per nom, the article can be recreated when/if he ever makes his professional debut peasant 01:30, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of football (soccer) related deletions. John Hayestalk 01:57, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. пﮟოьεԻ 57 11:01, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. GiantSnowman (talk) 16:46, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - per WP:N. 11800 hits on Google including e.g. AS, El Correo, Premiership latest, Footy247, Svenskafans and Goal. Sebisthlm (talk) 10:25, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment hits aren't everything, but admittedly some of those links look useful to meet the base criteria. Build them into the article, to establish notability and I might change my mind. John Hayestalk 11:12, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Clarification - My assertion of notability was not based upon the number of hits per se, but on the the links themselves. A lot of the hits were from message boards and fan sites, which not necessarily means general notability, but there are probably more independent and reliable links in the result. Sebisthlm (talk) 14:07, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment hits aren't everything, but admittedly some of those links look useful to meet the base criteria. Build them into the article, to establish notability and I might change my mind. John Hayestalk 11:12, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Heshs Umpire (talk) 13:40, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom BanRay 20:36, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Struway2 (talk) 09:41, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.