Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mila (Doctor Who) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:44, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mila (Doctor Who)

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

According to this article, the character has only made three appearances in the series, and thus seems relatively minor overall. I also cannot find any SIGCOV for the character, and thus it seems as though Mila doesn't meet GNG or SIGCOV. Given that she is a companion, albeit brief, it might be worth adding a mention of her to either the supporting characters list or Companions article as an alternative to straight deletion. Pokelego999 (talk) 19:42, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Science fiction and fantasy. Pokelego999 (talk) 19:42, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into the relevant audio drama articles or into an appropriate list as described in the nomination. There's no practical reason (like ease of navigation) that such an insignificant character needs their own article, and GNG is clearly not met here. Actualcpscm (talk) 20:16, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Television, and United Kingdom. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 21:23, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete minor character in three very minor spin-offs I assume have zero notability of their own as they have absolutely no sources. No one is going to search for this; if they really want information on such an obscure topic Tardis Data Core exists. Case of “It’s doctor who so it simply IS notable”. Dronebogus (talk) 09:48, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No sources for notability. Not everything in the Whoniverse needs an article. QuicoleJR (talk) 16:59, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not enough reliable coverage to pass
WP:SIGCOV. Shooterwalker (talk) 20:44, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete lacks indepth coverage fails
WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 23:36, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.