Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Millie Williamson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:46, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Millie Williamson

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet

WP:NGYMNAST. Competed at the youth level, now retired. Mvqr (talk) 12:29, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Mvqr (talk) 12:29, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Mvqr (talk) 12:29, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:19, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete doesn't meet
WP:GNG. — NZFC^(talk)^(cont) 01:57, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 22:48, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does not meet criteria in
WP:NGYMNAST for notability.Marshelec (talk) 22:52, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete: No reliable sources, no evidence of notability. Fails GNG. TheDreamBoat (talk) 23:10, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.