Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minh Thai

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗plicit 11:30, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Minh Thai

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

WP:ANYBIO. References, where not primary, are just passing mentions or describing primarily the 1982 World Rubik's Cube Championship. (If deemed necessary, some content can probably be incorporated there.) Web search does not help here either, and apart from the described kinds of sources returns irrelevant results, such as this Britannica biography on a revolutionary. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 20:18, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 20:18, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Sportspeople, and Vietnam. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:47, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, Gnewspapers has several mentions of him. Most are an AP article from 1982 [1], this in French [2] from Canada. This from a magazine [3]. Oaktree b (talk) 00:53, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Just noting that the third one is essentially a passing mention and not really significant coverage. (It is also already referenced in the article.) 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 10:32, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

fyi, that French one from Canada is the same AP story. So that's only one source. -- asilvering (talk) 02:57, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, per above // Timothy :: talk 00:09, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:44, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, $Salvio giuliano$ 08:47, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. Oaktree b's additional sources make this (barely) notable. Fad Ariff (talk) 12:09, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.