Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miri Hanai (2nd nomination)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC(talk) 19:21, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Miri Hanai

Miri Hanai (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is very borderline, hence it sitting in

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:44, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:44, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:44, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete no sign of notability. Wikipedia has no grandfather clause to allow old material to stand without applying current notability guidelines and for good reason, prior to 2006 we had no notability guidelines at all, and it was not until after 2010 we made it possible to quickly delete totally unsourced articles on living people. There are other factors, like how we used to allow people to create articles without even having an account. I still think we should make all new articles go through the Articles for creation process. We make it too easy to create articles and too difficult to remove them.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:53, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: She has released several works as shown on her Oricon profile (NSFW warning) but none of them have charted on national DVD/Blu-ray charts. lullabying (talk) 23:03, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails notability guidelines. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 17:05, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.