Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miriam Marx

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 Talk Work 23:29, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Miriam Marx

Miriam Marx (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Marx is almost completely known just because her father was a famous actor. Her one action that got her any notice, editing the letters her father wrote her into a book, would not have ever garnered enough notice if her father had been anyone else, and only got her very passing notice. This is just not the stuff notability is made of John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:15, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 13:25, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 13:26, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 13:33, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Having famous parents doesn't preclude individual notability and, in fact, makes it more likely. The LA Times thought she was notable enough to publish a long, by-lined obituary upon her death in 2017. pburka (talk) 17:54, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Her death was also covered by the Hollywood Reporter. I've done some text clean up and added additional refs. --Dnllnd (talk) 20:05, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. There's enough here for notability. Might be closer question if it was still a BLP. Thanks Dnllnd for the improvements. Cool Hand Luke 17:23, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.