Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Asia Pacific 1974

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete single year edit about a pageant already community-deemed to be non-notable.--

^"talk" 20:38, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Miss Asia Pacific 1974

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Year version belonging to a pageant that was deemed not notable. (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Asia Pacific International) The Banner talk 06:57, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:00, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:00, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:00, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep or merge - my understanding is that competitions like this on the international level are generally notable. DaltonCastle (talk) 23:39, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:56, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as nothing suggesting a better improved article. SwisterTwister talk 04:15, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete @User:DaltonCastle we can't merge it into the deleted parent article. This pageant is not a notable event, it is minor and gets pretty much no press. The article should have been deleted from the Miss_Asia_Pacific_1974 discussion. Legacypac (talk) 03:37, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Is it not related to Miss Asia Pacific World? Can't it just be merged there? DaltonCastle (talk) 05:42, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh!: Looked into it, Miss Asia Pacific World is not the same as Miss Asia Pacific International. In that case, you can probably ignore my keep votes. DaltonCastle (talk) 05:45, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.