Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Chinese (Vancouver) Pageant

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Closing as no consensus, as no other participants have agreed with the nominator's notion of the article being promotional, and the most recent !vote simply states "Not notable, small-time pageant event", but does not address the sources that were presented in the discussion. Also, an event being "small-time" does not necessarily mean that a topic is non-notable as a default. North America1000 03:23, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Chinese (Vancouver) Pageant

talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats
)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A

WP:PROMO page on an unremarkable pageant. Article is full of trivia and is entirely self-cited. Significant RS coverage not found; what comes up is either local to Vancouver or PR-driven / trivial mentions. Proposing either a "Delete" or a "Redirect" to Miss Chinese International Pageant, for which the Vancouver event serves as a feeder pageant. K.e.coffman (talk) 16:48, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 16:48, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:16, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:16, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:16, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the
list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:16, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply
]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:17, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 01:42, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 08:55, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.