Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mission Verde Center

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — The Earwig talk 00:07, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mission Verde Center

Mission Verde Center (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

2010 article about a local green energy centre. Refbombed but I don’t think it ever was notable. Mccapra (talk) 10:07, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 10:07, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 10:07, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 10:07, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete the sourcing does not actually rise to the level of showing this is a notable institution.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:37, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting owing to age of article rather than soft deleting.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 01:46, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete — Per rationale provided by Mccapra. Notability isn’t just there. Celestina007 (talk) 18:45, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: This is written like an advertisement; it tells what Mission Verde Center will offer or undertake. As per Mccapra this is refbombed. --Whiteguru (talk) 11:01, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. A slew of "references" that provide no information about the topic. No evidence of meeting
    WP:GNG. --Kinu t/c 23:22, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.