Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mister Saint Laurent

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 22:55, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mister Saint Laurent

Mister Saint Laurent (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This is a strictly autobiographical article written by an obviously extremely egotistical man. He is not notable in any way, shape, or form, and if he did not make this page, no one would continue to know who he is. He claims to be 'one of the most famous pro wrestling commentators in the United States', which is absolutely ridiculous. He operates on a lowscale level and if he's granted his own page, why not give a page to any two bit independent wrestler in the country? CraftyOlSal (talk) 18:25, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - the article ITSELF doesn't appear to make any of the claims written up in the AfD nomination and it sounds rather pointy. I'm not finding GREAT sources, but there are some sources that seem to indicate he has done professional wrestling. On the other hand, the page creator claims to to be the subject of the article and obviously has some issues, since he *has* made the claims above (and some other hilarious ones aside on the article talk page). About 500 ghits once you strip out the shitty myspaces sites and low-quality YouTube videos, and one newspaper article that I just blew $2 to verify actually mentions the guy by his full name as well as wrestling name. Still, it's not a very strong claim to notability, despite his very high opinion of himself. -- Logical Premise ^Ergo? 19:09, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per nom. Not much else to say,
  talk) 21:26, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Note: This debate has been included in the
  talk) 00:01, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• delete- not notable.[1] Sticky Parkin 01:46, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Somebody delete this page already! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.182.52.84 (talk) 02:20, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.