Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammad Gulzar Saifi
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was No consensus.
talk) 03:53, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply
]
Mohammad Gulzar Saifi
A whopping total of 26 Google hits for this name. 161 for just "
Mohammad Gulzar Saifi into the article The Final Inch and deleting with or without redirect. (A note: The user who started this article is currently unable to participate in this discussion due to the terms of an ArbCom decision. If it is felt that my nomination of the article at this time is inappropriate, please postpone it until he is able to contribute directly to the conversation.) Bueller 007 (talk) 08:06, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply
]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:12, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep. Nominator is suggesting merging, which is not a deletion. See ]
- I am not necessarily suggesting merging, although I would be satisfied with this outcome. I would like a decision about whether the article should be kept at all---hence I said "delete with or without redirect". Google hits seem to suggest that the subject of the article is completely non-notable---from what I understand it's not even been well confirmed that he is actually the protagonist in the movie---and therefore he may be unworthy even of having his info copied to The Final Inch. And if he is truly the protagonist, the meagre amount of information we have about him could be copied to the page about the movie, but that does not necessarily mean that a redirect page should be used. I am indeed asking for opinion about deletion of this page, therefore WP:Merge and delete does not apply. Bueller 007 (talk) 04:23, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:50, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- –SpacemanSpiff 01:40, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to WP:BLP1E case, and he would be best covered by being merged into the article on the film. Robofish (talk) 12:14, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.