Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammad Ubaidullah Bokhari

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  12:37, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mohammad Ubaidullah Bokhari

Mohammad Ubaidullah Bokhari (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for notability since 2015. SCOPUS gives an h-index of 4. Does not appear to pass

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:52, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:52, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Scopus is the wrong tool for computer science (it ignores the conferences, where most of the publications are) but even in Google scholar his citation counts are too low, in a high-citation field, for a pass of
  WP:PROF#C1. And there seems to be nothing else. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:36, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete. Nothing to indicate a pass of
  WP:PROF, citation counts are low and there are no additional sources. – Joe (talk) 10:40, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete does not meet any of the notability criteria for academics.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:14, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.