Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Molester's Train Housewife: Madam is a Pervert
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete.
]Molester's Train Housewife: Madam is a Pervert
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Molester's Train Housewife: Madam is a Pervert (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet
WP:SPIP. "4th Best Film at the Pink Grand Prix" is not a significant award as it's based on a fan poll. K.e.coffman (talk) 18:09, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 19:33, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 19:33, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:10, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:11, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, DannyS712 (talk) 18:26, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, DannyS712 (talk) 18:26, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jovanmilic97 (talk) 21:25, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
]- Delete just a random non-notable film. If the biggest claim to notability is Fourth place in
meaningless award that confirms no article Legacypac (talk) 02:40, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.