Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monetate

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 07:57, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Monetate

Monetate (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable company. article by paid editor. The award is local one only, not a national one. The NYTimes articles is about more general matters, not substantially about this particular company. DGG ( talk ) 23:25, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)|lambast 00:16, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)|lambast 00:16, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:29, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - The industry this company is in, it's not surprising there isn't significant and notable coverage as shown with my first News search (first five pages or so and goes as far as January 2013) but there's nothing significant and a a little under half is press releases. Books found some results as well as thefreelibrary and highbeam but I would say let's see if this is notable later. SwisterTwister talk 20:26, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails
    WP:ORG except press releases and general articles there is nothing specific about this particular company.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 06:25, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.