Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monique Parent

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:09, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Monique Parent

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable sexy lady. damiens.rf 13:36, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the

Anupmehra -Let's talk! 17:50, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the

Anupmehra -Let's talk! 17:50, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete Yes she is an actor but basic problem is we need in-depth write-ups from neutral reliable sources, not just listings that she was in such and such a film. I found a mention here but more is needed to meet the
WP:GNG.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 22:37, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:38, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - It's always made me cringe that WP has specific policy for these folks (i.e. WP:PORNSTAR). I don't see which criteria she'd meet. NickCT (talk) 14:01, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - @Damiens.rf: no one can ever beat this beauty [1] , Anyway no evidence of notability. –Davey2010 ^{Merry Xmas / Happy New Year} 21:41, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per
talk) 13:46, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.