Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monocle 24

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:50, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Monocle 24

talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Online-only radio stream, part of a UK magazine's website. Does not appear to be notable in its own right, but its parent magazine is. Suggest that a redirect to Monocle (brand) is appropriate. Flip Format (talk) 09:14, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Organizations, and United Kingdom. Flip Format (talk) 09:14, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - the content of the article suggests a level of notability, and I suspect some updated editing might qualify that. There is no benefit in either redirecting or merging with the brand article, it is bloated enough as it is, the information about the radio station in the brand article could be checked against the content article up for deletion. JarrahTree 09:43, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 10:39, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:19, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Meets
  WP:WEB. Sources in the article are reliable and in-depth enough IMV. SBKSPP (talk) 01:17, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep the subject passes
  WP:WEB with the sources already cited in the article. TipsyElephant (talk) 02:21, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.