Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MoparScape
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. As for including the material at
]MoparScape
Deprodded without comment by an anonymous user. This is an article on an illegal copyright violation of
]- Note: This debate has been included in the John Vandenberg 01:45, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:N. A lot more than 450 hits, but nothing that qualifies as independent editorial sources. Adrian M. H. 16:15, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry, I meant "kGhits" as shorthand for "thousand Ghits". CaptainVindaloo t c e 17:20, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with runescape client which allows people to access private servers, Should be noted on the runescape article but does not need an article of its own. Skullblade 23:58, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with Runescape! I agree that the article should be merged with the main Runescape main page.Wii Kid2 23:40, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
*Delete. No merge. Violates WP:SPAM and fails criteria of [[WP:BIO]].--Edtropolis 15:32, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Changed vote to Merge.--Edtropolis 15:35, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete looks like an ad. Drop the page and if we can figure out that this is really notable add something under "Cheating" in RuneScape. Also has no sources. I think we've had a number of AfDs for RuneScape cheats. OSborn 03:42, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.