Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mriganka Singh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui ^雲 _水 13:08, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mriganka Singh

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability at all. Necromonger...We keep what we kill 13:17, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CptViraj (📧) 13:47, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CptViraj (📧) 13:47, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. As always, people do not get Wikipedia articles just for standing as candidates in elections they did not win — the notability test at
WP:NPOL is holding a notable office, not just running for one. But this makes no other claim that she has preexisting notability for other reasons independently of the candidacies, and is not referenced to any significant or substantive coverage about her for the purposes of establishing that her candidacy was special: seven of the eight footnotes just glancingly namecheck her existence in the process of being about other things, which means she isn't their subject, and the only one that is "about" her is just a Q&A interview in which she's talking about herself and her political opinions in the first person, of exactly the type that every candidate in every election always gets, which means it isn't enough to make her candidacy more special than everybody else's candidacies all by itself. Bearcat (talk) 13:55, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete No real reason why she might be notable. The article kept on referring her as the daughter of
WP:INVALIDBIO. NNADIGOODLUCK (Talk|Contribs) 14:52, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete: fails
talk) 17:03, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete: Yup, as per
WP:NPOL. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:57, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete. Fails
WP:INVALIDBIO, since the article kept on referring to her as the daughter of Hukum Singh. LefcentrerightTalk (plz ping) 20:17, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:03, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete
talk) 07:27, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.