Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mullaly's Siding

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:11, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mullaly's Siding

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Quite literally an industrial rail siding. Not a notable topic. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 21:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Australia. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 21:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I don't see significant coverage in independent sources required to meet
WP:GNG. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:42, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete I'm confused why in the world a few yards of track to a flour mill would need an article. There's probably a few dozen sidings like this within ten miles of my house, dozens more that were removed since the area deindustrialized. Reywas92^Talk 01:00, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.