Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murat Saygıner

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (

Murat Saygıner

Murat Saygıner (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable commercial photographer. This lacks reliable third-party sources which give any indication of notability beyond a working photographer freshacconci talktalk 20:19, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. —freshacconci talktalk 20:21, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete a little premature for an encyclopedia...Modernist (talk) 23:48, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the
  talk) 00:02, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep The "International Photography Awards" seem to be a proper competition with a real jury and enough press to be notable itself (no Wikipedia article but would qualify) and the sponsoring foundation is real with "important" directors etc. So in my opinion he would qualify on the basis of these awards and there is also enough coverage of him in sources to make a case that way as well. Drawn Some (talk) 16:38, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Award-winning photographer that has been the subject of several magazine articles, including some front-page features. Sources listed in the article are sufficient to establish notability. --SharkxFanSJ (talk) 20:06, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Awards.--Ethicoaestheticist (talk) 23:06, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.