Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of Kylie Maybury

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Per

WP:SNOW NeilN talk to me 18:56, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Murder of Kylie Maybury

Murder of Kylie Maybury (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable unsolved murder. TheLongTone (talk) 11:28, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the
talk) 11:31, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply
]
Note: This debate has been included in the
talk) 11:31, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply
]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:58, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:58, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Indeed, absolutely bzarre nomination. Either way, the case has had both persistent and lasting coverage and that = notability.
    Pocketed 12:03, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Comment @
    talk) 12:21, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Ah I thank you
Pocketed 12:34, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply
]
It's blatantly obvious he's got a grudge, if anyone was to look at his history of AfD-ing. Not to mention the lack of civility about it. --GouramiWatcherTalk 14:09, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep and snow close. Article is sourced and clearly meets
    WP:GNG. Bad faith AFD nominations are an anathema and a topic ban may be in order. MarnetteD|Talk 16:30, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Good idea,
Pocketed 16:35, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply
]
Why ask me? I am not involved. --
"talk" 16:38, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply
]
Well exactly. Disinterested rather than uninterested.
Pocketed 16:40, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply
]
Whatever happens, can TheLongTone be disciplined for bad faith, lack of civility and use of the en-wikipedia to indulge his grudges and obsessions?
talk) 16:43, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.