Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MusicRadar (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Future plc. Any sourceable content can be merged from the history. Sandstein 08:29, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
MusicRadar
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
This (barely) survived AfD back in 2008, but it's had 15 years to improve since then and hasn't; it's still sourced entirely to itself. This wouldn't be a routine deletion—because a lot of Wikipedia articles reference it, outright deletion would leave a huge trail of redlinks—but IMO it should be redirected to
Iridescent 06:15, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the Iridescent 06:15, 12 February 2023 (UTC)]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 08:39, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ♠PMC♠ (talk) 07:47, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect to Future plc. There is no reason any of this information should be lost in the process; taken together it will still be a rather small section of the merge target. BD2412 T 06:16, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.