Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My/Mochi Ice Cream (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn following clarification of the article's situation (non-admin closure). Ouro (blah blah) 08:26, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
My/Mochi Ice Cream
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- My/Mochi Ice Cream (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Vote now changed to keep. A lot of the info here is from the company itself. Does not pass
WP:CORP, very little coverage about it in general. Additionally, the article reads like an advertisement. Something it would be prudent to consider is to simply merge the article into Mochi ice cream or Mikawaya, since the brand was created after a firm acquired Mikawaya. — Preceding unsigned comment added by OsmiumGuard (talk • contribs) 20:55, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
]
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly Talk to my owner:Online 21:27, 19 March 2024 (UTC)]
- Left guide (talk) 22:01, 19 March 2024 (UTC)]
- My official suggestion is that the article is merged. As it stands it shouldn't just be a standalone article. OsmiumGuard (talk) 23:15, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- And why do you believe it shouldn't be a standalone article? Consensus is that the topic is notable enough to keep the article, so you'd need to address the many sources presented in that first AfD to make a compelling case to change that consensus towards a merge. It's imperative to remember that Left guide (talk) 00:20, 20 March 2024 (UTC)]
- Originally I had believed the coverage to be trivial enough not to count towards anything and the sources themselves not to be worth anything, but upon closer inspection of the sources and Wikipedia's rules which I had misinterpreted at the time. I'll take this as a learning experience. !vote changed to keep. OsmiumGuard (talk) 00:42, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- And why do you believe it shouldn't be a standalone article? Consensus is that the topic is notable enough to keep the article, so you'd need to address the many sources presented in that first AfD to make a compelling case to change that consensus towards a merge. It's imperative to remember that
- My official suggestion is that the article is merged. As it stands it shouldn't just be a standalone article. OsmiumGuard (talk) 23:15, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Companies, and California. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 22:48, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy keep: this was already extensively litigated in an older AfD and closed as keep, the nominator acknowledges and agrees with that decision, essentially withdrawing the nomination, and there has been no substantial input from others. Other content-related objections can be resolved directly at the article/talk per Left guide (talk) 00:53, 20 March 2024 (UTC)]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.