Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Myndy Crist (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Since a significant number of comments are "weak", my conclusion is the community just isn't bothered whether we have an article or not. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 16:01, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Myndy Crist

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not seeing the significant credits required for

WP:BIO isn't satisfied either. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:02, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Women, and California. Shellwood (talk) 23:15, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I agree with mom.
WP:GNG. Laptopinmyhands (talk) 14:50, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

My long-lost child! At last, I've found you! Though you should really call me Dad. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:31, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the requirement of multiple significant roles in notable productions is not met.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:16, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Actually, she has appeared in lots of notable tv shows and some movies, but I am not satisfied with the sourcing so I vote delete. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 21:14, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
~~Weak Keep~~: I maintain my previous position. I think the
WP:GNG. Dflaw4 (talk) 11:17, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Update: I am updating my vote to Keep on the basis of the new source provided. Dflaw4 (talk) 13:13, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I should add that, while I am in no way suggesting this nomination was done in bad faith, it does appear to undermine the result of the first nomination, whereby the article remained, through lack of consensus. To my mind, it would make more sense to appeal the original decision, rather than re-nominate it in the hope that those voting two years on will take a harsher view. Such a practice renders the initial nomination and outcome redundant, and allows for nominations to be made multiple times over. Dflaw4 (talk) 12:56, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It is common practice to start a new discussion when so much time has passed. Many factors change in two years, making an appeal not necessarily relevant or applicable. Star Mississippi 02:59, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. I've added a source about Breaking News which directly details in a minor way. The working actor is often hard to document, since sources necessarily tend to focus on performance instead of personality (lots of that kind of character coverage material available). I reject NACTOR arguments, because the subject doesn't meet either criteria, IMHO. Based on my recent experience with Stephen Hogan, I'm sympathetic to keeping pages of working actors who are marginally sourced, but have a long IMDB credit list. BusterD (talk) 20:33, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Unclear if BusterD's source has been evaluated. Allow time to do so, and possibly form consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 03:00, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I have now updated my vote (please see above). Dflaw4 (talk) 13:13, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Leaning keep, based on a 34-year career including several multi-episode appearances in fairly major productions. BD2412 T 02:44, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Modussiccandi (talk) 12:05, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Long career with no real breakout roles = journeyperson. Clarityfiend (talk) 21:50, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete Mostly bit parts, nothing substantial found, one long career though. Oaktree b (talk) 14:44, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Week keep per BusterD. Crist won the Jury Best Actress Award at the 2019
WP:ANYBIO. Heartmusic678 (talk) 11:45, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.