Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Myron Belkind

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 13:37, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Myron Belkind

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not independently notable outside of his company, lack

WP:GNG, clearly corporate spam. Meeanaya (talk) 12:19, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Meeanaya (talk) 12:19, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Meeanaya (talk) 12:19, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:41, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:42, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unless we view the award or position as inherently notable, then nom is correct that he makes the coverage, he doesn't get it. (A recurring issue for both reporters and the actual news organisations). He's clearly an impressive journalist, but I don't believe he meets
WP:BASIC. No single redirect target Nosebagbear (talk) 10:28, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 02:35, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - neither award seems substantial or prestigious enough to overcome the fundamental lack of notability and decent independent sources covering the individual in any depth. Hug^syrup 13:01, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not notable. Here come the Suns (talk) 15:00, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - though as creator of the page I'm a bit biased, I've checked sources etc. again and agree with all above (except that it isn't corporate spam ;)). At the time I was still new (as I still feel compared to most of you) to Wiki and felt like the award, his presidency at the
general notability. Hurts me to see a "deletion" in my account history, but that's life I guess :D Thank you all for weighing in!--Ruhri Jörg 13:22, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

I went back to the first article I wrote (way back in 2012), which was both a COI and a failure of what we'd now call NORG, and didn't last past NPP. Mine was definitely clearer cut than this one! Nosebagbear (talk) 13:26, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@

read / remember this (although I'm not a complete newbie anymore, I hope ;)). Thanks again! --Ruhri Jörg 14:00, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete - the National Press Club is not so important a group that it would overcome
not so much coverage of him. Bearian (talk) 14:51, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.