Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nadia Jin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted (G11) by Fastily. Non-admin closure. Deor (talk) 15:35, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nadia Jin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to be non-notable. No reliable sources are provided and I can find none myself. The page has had a PROD and CSD disputed in the past. Only one majot contributor, possible COI but not possible to be sure. ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 20:24, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The CSD was disputed by the author. I've reapplied the G11 template but not the A7 as this AfD has been initiated. It has also been blanked twice by the author. OlYeller^Talktome 20:41, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Looking past the blatant advertorial content, the subject does not satisfy any inclusion guidelines. Fails
WP:CREATIVE which is also not satisfied. Victoria Beckham wearing your print in a dress not made by you, does not make a person notable. It probably doesn't even make the company that made the dress notable. OlYeller^Talktome 20:41, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. — — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 21:19, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 21:19, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.